The Importance of Surveying in Exterior Construction

In building-exterior (landscape) and hard-scape projects, pre-construction surveying is absolutely critical. Verifying property boundaries and monuments, and staking out precise positions for structures exactly as shown in the design drawings, are essential for ensuring construction accuracy. Even a slight positional error can cause fences or walls to encroach on a neighboring lot or leave an approach pathway the wrong width. Thorough surveying before work begins prevents rework and disputes, guaranteeing that the finished product matches the design.

Exterior and landscape work must also account for ground contours and gradients. Accurate elevation surveys of the site—and a clear understanding of height benchmarks—are needed to keep drainage plans on track and finish levels correct. In slab concrete or grading work, a variance of just a few centimeters can drastically affect water runoff and the finished appearance, so precise elevation measurements and string-line leveling are vital. Boundary surveys and control-point placement also carry legal weight; an incorrect boundary can spark conflicts with adjoining properties.

In short, surveying forms the foundation for construction quality and smooth project execution in exterior and landscape works.

​

Traditional Survey Methods and Their Challenges

Exterior and civil-works sites have long relied on traditional surveying tools: total stations (TS), optical levels, measuring tapes, and spirit levels. Surveyors first drive reference stakes or set up benchmarks, then measure distances with tapes or shoot angles and distances with the TS to locate points. For example, when positioning a building, gate, or walkway, they stretch string lines from known points and offset with a tape to mark the locations. Horizontal and vertical levels are set by taking staff readings with an automatic level and marking the required elevations.Even though seasoned craftsmen can achieve high accuracy with these methods, their manual nature inevitably leaves some challenges unresolved.

​

The first challenge is the labor and time required. Even with a total station, at least two people are needed—one to hold the prism and another to operate the instrument—and on large sites or where many points are involved, the survey can take an entire day. When setting out with a tape measure and chalk, you must measure and mark repeatedly, which is very time-consuming; over long distances the tape can sag or drift from a straight line, and small errors can accumulate. This is especially burdensome on complex landscape projects, where curved or angled layouts demand fine measurements and calculations that the traditional methods struggle to handle efficiently.

​

The second challenge is measurement error and human error. Because workers must read and record values manually, even a small mis-reading or mis-writing can shift the layout. If, for example, a tape measurement of 503 cm is written down as 508 cm, the resulting line could be off by five centimeters. Misreading the bubble in a level can likewise throw gradients out of tolerance. Stakes or chalk marks placed on site may be rubbed out by other trades, forcing a re-survey and additional work. These human mistakes and re-do’s translate directly into schedule delays and extra costs.

Urban jobsites and cluttered environments pose another problem: line-of-sight for a total station can be blocked, or there may be no convenient place to set up the instrument. In a courtyard surrounded by buildings, for instance, you might have to establish an intermediate reference point and measure indirectly, adding steps and increasing the chance of error. In short, traditional surveying methods can demand considerable labor, time, and personnel, and can struggle to maintain accuracy under certain site conditions.

​

How RTK Positioning Works and Why It Helps
A new technology that resolves these challenges is RTK-GNSS surveying. RTK—short for Real-Time Kinematic—is a high-precision positioning method that corrects GNSS (satellite-positioning) errors in real time, achieving centimetre-level accuracy.

In practice, the system uses two receivers: a fixed base station with known coordinates and a mobile rover that takes measurements while moving. Both units simultaneously track signals from four or more GNSS satellites (e.g., GPS, GLONASS). The base station calculates the real-time difference (error) between its known position and the satellite data it observes, then transmits this correction to the rover. The rover applies the correction instantly, outputting a position whose error has been removed—yielding centimeter-level accuracy.

With this relative-positioning method, the several-metre errors common to stand-alone GPS are shrunk to just a few centimetres, allowing consistently high-precision surveying. In practice, RTK positioning is generally accurate to about ±2 cm, giving virtually error-free results even for on-site layout in exterior-construction projects.

Introducing RTK-GNSS surveying makes exterior and civil-works processes dramatically more efficient. Because RTK delivers positioning data in real time, there is no need to measure each point and snap chalk lines over and over. Simply place a pole or handheld unit with a GNSS receiver at the required spot and the high-precision coordinates are obtained on the spot. As a result, layout is completed far more quickly than with conventional methods, cutting survey time substantially.

For instance, on one civil-engineering site, drone surveying equipped with RTK made ground control points unnecessary and slashed the overall survey time. Likewise, in exterior works, tasks such as leveling and laying out an entire site—previously a half-day job—can now be completed in just a few hours, dramatically improving efficiency.

Another major benefit is labor savings. With an RTK unit, a single operator can simply walk the site with the receiver, turning what used to require a full survey crew into a one-person job. This is especially valuable for an industry facing labor shortages, and it lets small to mid-size sites deploy scarce surveying specialists more efficiently. The cost-reduction effect is significant as well: because high-precision surveying can be completed quickly, reports show that site labor costs drop sharply compared with conventional methods. Fewer errors also mean less rework and fewer add-on fixes, so overall the cost benefits outweigh the equipment investment.

RTK also brings the advantage of full data digitalization. Because every surveyed point is stored as digital coordinates, the information can later be imported directly into drawings or shared via the cloud. Results that used to be managed through field notebooks and photos are now captured automatically as electronic data, eliminating omissions and transcription errors. Should extensions or additional work be required later, the saved coordinates let you pinpoint existing structures immediately—an obvious plus for repeat projects.

RTK positioning is usable not only on open suburban sites but, under the right conditions, on urban jobs as well. In Japan, network-based RTK services that leverage the Geospatial Information Authority’s reference-station network and the Quasi-Zenith Satellite “Michibiki” CLAS augmentation are spreading, so even mountain or offshore sites with limited internet access can achieve high-precision positioning. Major civil contractors are already accelerating their on-site use of high-accuracy GNSS, aiming to raise quality while reducing field workload. RTK is no longer a niche tool for specialist surveyors; it is quickly becoming standard practice for exterior construction, infrastructure inspection, and everyday job-site tasks.

​

Comparison: Traditional Methods vs. RTK Positioning
Let’s examine the concrete differences between conventional, largely manual surveying and RTK-GNSS surveying across the key factors.

CategoryConventional Surveying Methods (Total Station, Tape, etc.)RTK-GNSS Surveying (RTK Layout)

Manual work by skilled operators can reach millimeter- to few-centimeter-level precision, but accumulated human error can still lead to deviations.Tape measurements over long distances can risk errors of several centimeters, whereas RTK consistently maintains centimeter-level accuracy—about ± 2 cm.Errors do not accumulate, so positioning remains consistently accurate, and GNSS also captures elevation differences precisely.

Requires a crew of at least two people—for example, one to set up and operate the instrument and another to hold the staff or prism—so constant coordination between multiple workers is necessary.

A single operator can handle the task; no assistant is required, which simplifies staffing. With fewer people nearby, the work is easier and safer.

Work time – Measuring and marking each point repeatedly is time-consuming; for large areas with many points the process can take anywhere from half a day to several days.Coordinates are obtained and points are staked out in real time, making the process vastly faster—layout time can often be cut to less than half of what conventional methods require.

Ease of use — Each instrument requires specialized operation (e.g., reading angles on a total station, leveling adjustments). Clear line-of-sight setup and survey calculations also demand expert knowledge.

With just a GNSS receiver and a handheld device, you can begin positioning fairly easily. Modern RTK units use intuitive app interfaces, so practically anyone can operate them.

Data management—Handled via handwritten notes or marked drawings, which carry risks of omissions or misreadings and require extra effort to digitize later.

Positioning data are recorded digitally and can be stored in the cloud, making it easy to share and analyze survey results—and eliminating the risk of transcription errors.

Cost — Basic tools such as tapes and spirit levels are inexpensive, but they incur high labor costs. More advanced surveying demands costly instruments like total stations, and any errors can add hidden re-work expenses.RTK receivers and related equipment require an upfront investment, but the savings in labor and shorter project timelines quickly recoup the cost. Hardware prices have also fallen in recent years, and subscription-based options are now available to minimize the initial outlay.

* The accuracy and time requirements of conventional methods depend heavily on site conditions and human factors. Likewise, the effectiveness of RTK positioning varies with sky visibility and availability of augmentation services; the table above compares typical scenarios. RTK hardware has become increasingly affordable—services such as LRTK, for example, offer subscription-based plans that keep upfront costs low, making adoption feasible even for small and mid-sized firms. When labor savings and the elimination of rework due to layout errors are factored in, the return on investment (ROI) for RTK is generally very favorable.

​

Utilizing LRTK and Its Implementation Benefits
Among the newest RTK-GNSS solutions, LRTK has attracted particular attention on construction sites. Developed by our company, LRTK is a high-precision positioning system that pairs with a smartphone, enabling easy centimeter-level surveying. The flagship “LRTK Phone” is an ultra-compact, pocket-sized RTK-GNSS receiver; simply attach it to an iPhone or iPad and the handset becomes a full-fledged high-accuracy survey instrument. Weighing only about 125 g and just 13 mm thick, the receiver houses its own battery and antenna, so clipping this single unit to a phone instantly creates a versatile, field-ready surveying tool.

Thanks to a dedicated phone case that clicks on in one motion, each worker can literally carry one unit and start surveying whenever needed.

LRTK’s greatest advantages are the operability and flexibility gained through smartphone integration. Install the LRTK app on an iOS device, connect to the receiver via Bluetooth, and you can begin surveying immediately. In the app you can view real-time coordinates, display your position on design drawings or 3-D models imported from the cloud, and even get on-site guidance with AR-based layout support. With a single phone, LRTK handles everything from positioning and point-cloud capture to layout marking, guidance, photo measurement, and AR simulation.

You can use the captured coordinates to calculate distances, areas, and even cut-and-fill volumes, meaning a single iPhone or iPad paired with LRTK covers virtually every surveying function required for exterior work. By automating specialized tasks and presenting them through an intuitive UI, LRTK is easy to operate even for on-site staff with no surveying expertise—an advantage traditional equipment simply doesn’t offer.

Another key advantage of LRTK is cloud-based management and data sharing. Survey data and photos captured with the LRTK app can be uploaded and synced instantly to the LRTK Web cloud service, allowing office staff to review and verify coordinates and images from their PCs in real time.

For example, in exterior-work progress reports, cloud-shared survey data let you instantly send a message—complete with coordinates—such as “the foundation at point X has been placed exactly as specified,” providing solid evidence for supervisors or clients. Unlike paper field notes, there is no risk of missing records, because the data are automatically backed up and archived, eliminating “we forgot to measure that spot” scenarios. Continuous sharing of up-to-date information among all stakeholders drives digital transformation (DX) in construction and maintenance management.

LRTK’s centimeter-level accuracy and portability are proving valuable far beyond exterior and landscape work. On expressway inspections, a worker can clip the receiver to a helmet and simply walk the median, continuously locating guardrails and glare shields. Confusion such as “Which post had the defect?” disappears when each asset is tagged with coordinates, because the exact position and ID are saved on a cloud map. In bridge maintenance, once damage points are logged with LRTK there is no uncertainty later about where repairs are needed. On building sites, too—for instance, laying out a large commercial complex—one person can mark lighting poles, benches, and planting spots in sequence, so the construction crew can start immediately without waiting for a survey team. Field results indicate positioning accuracy of about ±3 cm, providing confidence even for small ornamental elements. These cases clearly demonstrate how LRTK brings high-precision, labor-saving surveying straight to the work site.

Engineers involved in exterior construction, landscaping, and infrastructure maintenance can achieve a fundamentally higher level of efficiency and quality by leveraging RTK positioning. By digitizing labor-intensive surveying tasks and delivering “high-precision surveying made easy for anyone,” LRTK is poised to become a standard tool on tomorrow’s job sites. If you are interested in boosting productivity with RTK, please review the detailed materials and consider applying LRTK to your projects.